Some good analysis across the 2 magazines, mostly using subject terminology well and showing some good understanding of convention. Some comparison, looking at how the magazines target different audiences would help. Check for spelling and typos.
Some good analysis across the 2 magazines, mostly using subject terminology well and showing some good understanding of convention. Some comparison, looking at how the magazines target different audiences would help. Check for spelling and typos.
Some good analysis across the 2 magazines, mostly using subject terminology well and showing some good understanding of convention. Some comparison, looking at how the magazines target different audiences would help. Check for spelling and typos.
ReplyDeleteSome good analysis across the 2 magazines, mostly using subject terminology well and showing some good understanding of convention. Some comparison, looking at how the magazines target different audiences would help. Check for spelling and typos.
ReplyDelete